| Author | Message |
WarmWater
1586 posts |
#413245 2008-01-27 12:59 GMT |
|
Did you know it's against the law for schools to want kids medicated??
Most parents don't know this. Schools are not suppose to mention meds to parents. They want kids medicated who have ADHD. THis is a federal law and it's here http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:4:./temp/~c108S1e3IH:: Most parents don't know this law exists and schools continue to do this because they know there is no enforcement to make them do right and follow this law. If there was, they wouldnt' keep wanting parents to medicate their children. My question is, did you know about this law? And do you have any experiences with schools doing this? Oops sorry I didn't know the link didin't work, try this one http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:4:./temp/~c108S1e3IH:: I don't know why the link is not working, so cut and paste this in your browser http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:4:./temp/~c108VGkZWy:: I'm so sorry I don't know why the link won't work. Go to http://thomas.loc.gov/ and search for 'child safety medication act of 2003' |
|
TakeItEasy
1617 posts |
#413246 2008-01-27 13:02 GMT |
|
No I didnt. =)
|
|
CarpetShark
1577 posts |
#413247 2008-01-27 13:08 GMT |
|
i did not know this law existed and am very glad that i do now. though im sure i would have found it on my own eventually when it was time for my child to start school. i have a very high energy 3 year old. my brother is concerned that the schools will label him as having adhd and want him medicated. none of us buy into that whole adhd crap.
|
|
Chancer
1598 posts |
#413248 2008-01-27 13:08 GMT |
|
It isn't against the law for them to WANT your child medicated, it is against the law for them to SUGGEST, or hint your child be medicated.
I did know about this. Sad more people don't though, also sad that so many people medicate their kids, just to make them easier to manage...what's wrong with this picture?? And for the second part, yes, I have had experience, the school walked that danger line with me about my now 9yo son, they thought he was ADD and ADHD. Turns out, he was just too smart for his own britches, bored in school, and a little BAD. ;) Did you know that they are also not allowed to require a social security number for your child to be enrolled? They will even lie and say it is required, but it isn't, it just makes their paperwork easier, as if they don't have one, they have to assign a random number to your child, making more work for them. But don't get me started on schools! ;) Talk about a love/hate relationship! WENDY - the school can't label your child ADD/ADHD, only a Dr can. Stand your ground, he is probably just a normal, rambuntious boy...he's a BOY! If they suggest it, ask your pediatrician, he can quiet your fears, and you can tell the school he is not, with confidence. Also, if they suggest meds, politely inform them of the law..they should quickly back off. |
|
LazyDogg
1563 posts |
#413249 2008-01-27 13:12 GMT |
|
Could you fix the link?
|
|
Species
1653 posts |
#413250 2008-01-27 13:17 GMT |
|
i hope that if a teacher has serious concerns about one of my children's behavior, education, or general well-being, that they will bring it up with me. if they feel it's worth discussing with a pediatrician, psychiatrist, or school counsellor, i hope they'll mention that, as well. but i would then expect them to leave to me the decision whether to pursue those avenues. yes, i did know about the law, and i agree i would *never* want a teacher saying they think a child should be medicated. even kids who do have adhd or add don't necessarily require medications. that is a decision for the parents and a medical professional. not a teacher. once a teacher mentions that they think some kid needs meds, not only might they be wrong, but there is also the potential sense on the part of the parents (right or wrong) that the teacher will penalize their child if the parents don't follow that suggestion. so hurray for the law. which is not the same as saying that it never happens that meds can benefit a kid. just that the teacher should not be the one raising that.
|
|
Cosmiclight
1599 posts |
#413251 2008-01-27 13:34 GMT |
|
I know the link worked when the question was first posted, but it doesn't work anymore.
|
|
PunkRocker
1670 posts |
#413252 2008-01-27 13:34 GMT |
|
Didn't know about but wish I had years ago when my son was in 1st grade and his teacher kept calling my home wanting to know when I was going to start him on ritalin. She was just convinced he was ADHD.
I never did put him on meds and told her to quit calling me, made it clear I was not medicating my child just because she wanted to be a lazy ass teacher. The calls stopped and she got the picture. About 3 years later (after extensive testing) we learned my son was not ADHD and never was ADHD. He has ODD and I was told they do not medicate kids with ODD. So thank God I listened to my own good sense instead of that teacher! If I had just listened to her he would have been on a medication that wasn't needed! |
|
BlueButterFly
1610 posts |
#413253 2008-01-27 13:49 GMT |
|
First, your link doesn't work. And this may be a local law... I have never heard of such a thing. But if you ask me, the parents need to be on top of their children and the schools to ensure the school doesn't try to push medication as an answer.
|
|
DoubleParked
1626 posts |
#413254 2008-01-27 14:16 GMT |
|
Yes, I do know of this law. It's a federal law, not state or local. The school/teacher should not mention medication to you or suggest that you place your child on it. They may suggest that because of difficulties a child is experiencing or behaviors exhibited in class that the parent/guardian see a medical professional to rule out physical causes. For example, "I notice that even when I work with ____ in a small group of three students, that he/she is unable to focus for more than a few minutes at a time. This lack of focus is causing him/her to fall behind in class. Perhaps you could consult with your doctor to rule out any physical causes, then we can continue on from there to see how we might best help _____ be more successful." A school/teacher should never try to push you to medicate your child if you do not wish to do so. But the school will need you to work with them so that the child does learn to focus. It's difficult and takes teamwork. It's a lot of work for both teachers and parents/guardians. Follow through at home is essential.
|
|
Loveatfirstsight
1544 posts |
#413255 2008-01-27 14:30 GMT |
|
I wish I would have heard about this last year, the teacher in my son's school tried to tell me and my hubby that our son had ADHD and everything else with it ,anyway make long story short my son was never tested but he is a straight A honor student I feel that most teachers do not want the time and energy to work them they are more interested in the money rather than the kids in my kids school the politics rule everybody else does not matter and the teacher paid a local politic. 10,000 to get her the job how do I know when she went out with her friends we ran into her at a high end bar/grill and she was drunk and bragging about it and now she is not happy that everybody knows that one I am sure this just does not happen in my home town but others as well.
|
|
Stare
1584 posts |
#413256 2008-01-27 14:46 GMT |
|
The schools wanted my kid medicated for ADHD, but, luckily, before I went to the appointment, I googled laws and kids with ADHD, and found that law. I printed it out and showed it to the principal and teacher, and boy! did that send them packing. We eventually did begin to medicate him, but I'm gald that it was a choice born from careful thought, not from being pressured into it.
|
|
Jake
1523 posts |
#413257 2008-01-27 15:00 GMT |
|
I was pretty sure it was against the law, but I know several parents who have been told by teachers that their kids need to be on ADHD meds, and because the teachers are supposed "authorities," parents tend to take their word for it and try the meds. Some of these kids have other learning issues, and I really believe that the med recommendation can be a search for a quick fix.
We were fortunate enough to work with a teacher who wouldn't just say "Give her a pill," but we still felt a lot of pressure to take our child to the pediatrician and have her "attention problem" seen to. It's true that she can get distracted by certain things, but she also can sit and read a book for 40 minutes at a shot, and we're glad we didn't rush into medication 3 years ago when the question first came up. |
|
ShoeLover
1623 posts |
#413258 2008-01-27 15:22 GMT |
|
I did not! My father is a lawyer and just contacted him as I read the question, he said yes this may be a strange law, but he has seen the case thousands of times!
I have been put in that same position with one of my children. But now I know I do not have to go with the schools wishes. Thank you for informing me! ~Gabbie |
|
FantasyFootball
1619 posts |
#413259 2008-01-27 16:57 GMT |
|
no its not
|
|
electric
1611 posts |
#413260 2008-01-27 17:24 GMT |
|
Yes, while a school should never mention medication. It is the parents responsiblity to have their child properly diagnosed and then decided if medication is a alternative. I think it is dumb for parents to rule it out with out trying. If your child can't focus in school then whats the point of them being there? Some medications help kids focus and have the ability to learn and retain information. Now is that a bad thing?
|
|
CherryBerry
1555 posts |
#413261 2008-01-27 17:33 GMT |
|
and we wonder why kids aren't learning...those poor parents are in denial that their children need meds. and the rest of the classroom students cannot learn without the teacher disciplining the out of control child every time
|
|



















